Spider-Man /
Rated: PG-13 |
Starring: Tobey Maguire, Kirsten Dunst, Willem Dafoe, James
Franco, J.K. Simmons
Directed by: Sam Raimi
Produced by: Grant Curtis, Ian Bryce, Laura Ziskin
Written by: Alvin Sargent, David Koepp, Sam Raimi, Scott
Rosenberg, Neil Ruttenberg
Distributor: Columbia Tristar
|
|
I know I'm being a lot more
critical and concise in this review, but something about
Spider-Man made me think from a critic's aspect for the first
time. When viewing this movie I was a member of the press, not just
an audience member. Because of this strange psychological
standpoint, I was able to see minor flaws, things that I wouldn't
ever normally notice. That's why this review will probably be
unusually longer...
Now let's talk about the casting crew. When I first saw the
trailer for Spider-Man, I thought that hiring Tobey Maguire
to play lead was a BIG mistake. I mean his name is even spelled
funny. When I last checked Toe-bee is spelled T-o-b-y, and Ma-Gwire
M-c-G-u-i-r-e. But, now I realize the casting crew did their job. He
was cheaper than others, younger than others, not to mention more
good looking than others. Tobey was the right choice for the role of
"Spider-Man".
It's absolutely amazing what they can do with a movie today!
The special effects in this picture were some of the best I've seen
since Return of the Jedi. The webs, the villain, the walking
up walls, it was completely mind blowing. I admit to seeing some
pretty corny on-screen effects in the first scenes that I just had
to laugh at, but it's hard to make a movie out of countless issues
of comic books.
Now that I've talked about the "good", it's time to talk about
the "bad". There were no flaws in Spider-Man that were
extremely noticeable, but me being in my "critic" state-of-mind, I
realized some things. As I said before, some of the stunts in the
beginning action-sequences were pretty unrealistic; but they made a
movie (which IS real), out of a comic book (which ISN'T). Another
thing that I wasn't satisfied with in Spider-Man was the
second to last scene. It was supposed to tie the film together, but
instead in kind of loosely nurtured it. The scene should be an
emotional and gripping, but it really doesn't serve that purpose.
Dunst was good, I will say. But, on the other hand, Maguire was
bland and said his lines like they were rushed, he probably really
didn't want to make the movie that day. It really spoiled the
ending. Not that the movie as a whole wasn't outstanding work.
In conclusion, Spider-Man was a delightful piece. Now, I
don't think it's deserved all of the money it's racked in so far.
But, it's in the fans hands, not mine. The aspect I really enjoyed
about it was that it had something for everyone. Romance, Actions,
Suspicion, Originality, Special Effects, you name it! Anyone can see
it; kids, teenagers, and adults alike will get something out of it.
For god's sake you can even take you 112 year old, dying Grandfather
if you want to! He'll probably think it's the best thing he's seen
in his whole life! Even though it's no Lord of the Rings,
Harry Potter, or Shrek, Spider-Man deserves
credit. It truly is a nice way to spend two hours and one minute of
your time.
-Danny, Bucket
Reviews
Back to Home
The Bucket Review's Rating Scale
|
|
|