| 
       
      Reviews 
      for the Week of 11/9: 
      
      
      Sorry for the lack of reviews this week and their delay. I will catch up 
      soon. 
      
        
        
        
        
            This movie makes me want 
        to slap myself so hard that I’ll forget about it. The Matrix 
        Revolutions destroys everything that the first two films in the 
        franchise stood for. The 1999 original and this year’s Reloaded 
        were unique; while they thought that they were smarter than they really 
        were, they were also fun, intriguing, and entertaining. After seeing 
        this third installment in the Matrix series, I would like to take 
        back everything bad that I said about its predecessors. I may have not 
        liked the first movie much, originally, but Revolutions proves 
        that you can do a whole lot worse. 
        
             During Revolutions, 
        characters discuss the balancing of life. Even though the Wachowski’s 
        successfully wrote about this in their screenplay, their work itself 
        isn’t balanced in the least bit. The first hour of this movie contains 
        only pointless scenes, full of unintelligent dialogue, and the final 
        seventy-nine minutes consist strictly of mind-numbing action. With no 
        sense of pacing, we easily drift into the realm of boredom, when 
        watching Revolutions. This, alone, makes it unworthy of 
        audiences’ money. 
        
             The special effects are 
        astounding, but they serve no purpose, whatsoever. While the action 
        scenes are superbly done, the reason for their existence is far too 
        obvious and dull. In the first two films, there was something being 
        achieved or resolved by each fight-sequence. In this final chapter, the 
        plot is simple: good vs. evil vs. machines. Add in some gunshots and big 
        explosions and you’ve got yourself a movie. Is this enjoyable? Not 
        really, even if it may be admirable. For nearly twenty minutes, 
        Revolutions is just like an animated movie, completely done on 
        computers. Our hero, Neo, isn’t even usually present; he’s only onscreen 
        for only about a fourth of time. 
        
             It would be worthless 
        for me to try to stray people away from this one, for they’ve already 
        been sucked into the franchise. I’d recommend catching Revolutions 
        on cable TV, simply to witness the end of the series. It certainly isn’t 
        worth the price of a ticket, though. This fact, alone, is so depressing 
        that it makes me want to guzzle down an entire bottle of Prozac. 
           
      
      
           Love Actually 
      represents why we go to the movies. It’s a joyous ride, chocked full of 
      great dialogue and heartwarming stories, a perfectly enjoyable piece of 
      fluff. Only adjectives can describe the pleasure I experienced when 
      watching it, for I have no clue why I did. I hate romantic comedies. I 
      hate Holiday-themed movies. I hate Hugh Grant. And I hate Hollywood 
      romaces. Love Actually is so damn good, though—it’s hard to resist, 
      no matter what your bias is. This is the kind of flick that gets better 
      every time you think about it, the disposable entertainment that you 
      cannot forget. What could be better? 
      
           There may be too many 
      things going on in Love Actually, but it has an incredible sense of 
      balance. Each story and each character is focused on just enough, and the 
      running length is adequate. While screenwriter-turned-director Richard 
      Curtis has a noticeably tough time behind the camera, his work is very 
      tolerable. Since the quality of filmmaking of Love Actually is the 
      least of the audience’s worries, it doesn’t affect the impression that it 
      makes on us. 
      
           I wouldn’t fret to call 
      this film a “chick flick,” but males and females will find it equally 
      enjoyable. There are many cheesy love stories here indeed, and they’ll 
      surely please female audiences. But the comedy, which is thankfully not 
      too sappy, has a great amount of cleverness, which makes this flick all 
      the more enjoyable for everyone. The delivery is flawless, too. Even 
      though it’s imperfect, I couldn’t ask anything more of Love Actually. 
      
           Economically, the making 
      of this movie was been brilliant. All of the members of the cast have 
      about ten minutes of screen-time each. They clearly didn’t have to spend 
      much time acting in it, but the studio can truthfully bill all of them, as 
      if they were leading roles. The big names, themselves, will draw in 
      crowds. Half of the ticket buyers will be seeing Love Actually for 
      its ensemble. However, whatever the reason may be, everyone who sees it 
      will not be disappointed. When it was all over, the old granny sitting 
      behind me raved that it was “a delicious movie.” I couldn’t agree more.
       
        
      
 
Back to Home 
The Bucket Review's Rating Scale 
             |