If there is a single 
        thing that Balls of Fury does extremely well, it’s that the film proves 
        that good ideas for movies do not necessarily translate into good movies 
        themselves. The trailer for Balls of Fury showed that the flick 
        had promise: ridiculous table-tennis matches, Christopher Walken acting 
        as outrageously as his muscles could muster, instances in which the term 
        “sudden death” literally meant sudden death. But in the feature, 
        all of these clever moments never amount to comedy of greater weight; 
        they merely exist as fragments that could’ve been part of a decent 
        movie. In essence, director Bob Odenkirk and screenwriters Thomas Lennon 
        and Ben Garant never bother to realize that corny lines and goofy 
        characters only prove truly amusing when they are supported by a 
        humorous background story. Balls of Fury certainly lacks any kind 
        of comedic meat, existing for the fruitlessly unfunny purpose of being 
        random. Not even Walken himself can save the floundering material; due 
        to the absence of a personality behind his character, the actor is left 
        to sit on the sidelines and play the same stereotype that he has in 
        countless other bad films. Only during the creatively-staged final 
        ping-pong match did I feel as though Balls of Fury was coming 
        into its own and, by that time, it was far too late for the picture to 
        redeem itself. Avoid this embarrassment and its insipid antics at all 
        costs.
 
        
        
        
        
        
        
             How unfortunate that 
        The Brothers Solomon, an affable comedy about two brothers trying to 
        make a baby (not together, of course) despite the fact that they are 
        totally unprepared to be parents, has been released on the same day that 
        the story of a Cincinnati woman killing her infant by leaving it in a 
        hot car has broken. I don’t mean to make light of such a serious issue 
        by comparing it to such a silly film; in fact, I believe that it is 
        disgraceful that the woman isn’t going to be prosecuted for her evil 
        doing. However, it should be noted that the viewer’s knowledge of the 
        occurrence makes The Brothers Solomon seem far less humorous than 
        it likely would’ve been a week ago. During a scene in which stars Will 
        Forte and Will Arnett each prepare for fatherhood by catching baby-dolls 
        as the other drops them from stories above, the whole experience has an 
        eerie quality about it. What might’ve come across as amusing when The 
        Brothers Solomon was being filmed now just serves as a reminder of 
        all the idiotic, unfit parents that exist in the world.
        
             That all being said, 
        The Brothers Solomon wouldn’t be a comedy worth writing home about 
        even if it didn’t bear the aforementioned, strange topicality. A great 
        many passages in the film remain unaffected by the recent events and 
        nonetheless prove only intermittently funny. For Forte and Arnett, 
        The Brothers Solomon represents only a mild (albeit raunchier) 
        step-up from their regular shtick seen every weekend on “Saturday Night 
        Live”. Much like recent episodes of that program, the movie was clearly 
        made with pleasant intentions, but never achieves a memorable level of 
        laugh-out-loud hilarity. In three or four months, The Brothers 
        Solomon will make for a perfectly acceptable rental. Until then, 
        moviegoers’ time is better spent watching more-inspired material.