Skip to content
Bucket Reviews — Reviews and criticism by Danny BaldwinTHE ARCHIVE
Reviews · essays · dispatches
← Back to the archive

FROM THE BUCKET REVIEWS ARCHIVE

Review: Solaris — Original Edition

Danny Baldwin · Publication date unknown — likely 2002

Bucket Rating: Full bucketFull bucketHalf bucket

Solaris pretends to have meaning, but does not. It leaves silence for viewers to think, but they have nothing to think about. Everything is superficial, and of no meaning; it wants us to envision the world that it shows, in a vague explanation. Soderbergh wants us to question every move the different characters make, but we don’t. The movie isn’t a train wreck, but is still one of the worst of the year. I was entertained by some parts, and the ending makes a strong comeback from the wretched start, but this one isn’t worth your money. Solaris is maddening, annoying, and all viewers will have some regret to watching it.

The story is about life and death. It takes place in outer space, in another dimension, and on earth. We are never sure of what’s going on, and when it’s happening, but we don’t care because the filmmakers try to explain it with the utmost recklessness. Some might pretend as though they know what’s going on (including the person who took me to see it), but they don’t. Only Soderbergh knows what emotions are coming out of his film, and it doesn’t seem like he wants to let others in on the secret. It’s uncomfortable at times to watch because it seemingly wants to lead viewers into a trap of uncertainty. Critics who want to gain prestige and admiration choose to recommend this because of its bizarre content, and how “interesting” it is. I am going to go down on it as hard as I can, because I want to tell it like it is, and make sure that you know the truth of the matter.

No one wants to listen to this type of miserable tale, especially when it is put together as poorly as Solaris is. What’s the point of being puzzled and confused when seeing a supposedly enjoyable flick? I like thoughtful pieces, which can be enjoyed, but this film pretends to have thought and does not. We get much mix up about death, life, and souls; which is all good, except here, it is truly meaningless. There is a certain level of irony in the way that Soderbergh writes the screenplay, but this doesn’t help at all. I am intrigued by shows that have one or two hidden meanings, that aren’t extremely crucial to the plot’s well-being, but Solaris is just one giant contrast of these messages, which can be completely misinterpreted. When most every critic on the web has a different take on a film, there is something seriously wrong with the entire motion picture.

I have no problem with the acting, though it isn’t the best in the world. All Clooney wants to do, along with Soderbergh, is earn enough cash to make another “Oceans” film. Clooney is stark and unwilling in his performance, though his talents did not have much to work with. He plays the man who willingly travels to the planet Solaris, a place where most of the film takes place, and is not even worth talking about. Natascha McElhone is about level with Clooney, even though her rather small part isn’t enough to call a lead. These talented individuals could’ve excelled with better material, but like most parts are chosen, the actors took them to work as one of their “get rich quick” schemes. The film was shot in only 42 days, McElhone probably was there 20 of them, and Clooney 30. These are just estimates, but trust me, I’m probably very close in my approximations.

Despite the very frustrating concept, which constantly angered me; Solaris is a solidly made film. When Soderbergh sleepwalks through his direction, the end result is still good. We can admire the filmmaking, but the problem is there is nothing of real value for us to like in the film. I want to it watch again, even though it is an uncomfortable ride. Unopinionated individuals will have no problem watching this, but if you disagree with what Solaris states it is an experience full of hateful tension.

Solaris is seemingly one of those movies you either hate or you love. If you have even remotely read this review, though, you know what my position is. There are many who would call this one good because of its bizarre ways, and odd look, just as some do with foreign films. The truth is that these odd looking visuals are to cover up from the terribly looking heart of the film. In a word: no. I am definitely not recommending Solaris to anyone; I certainly couldn’t get the hang of it.

-Danny, Bucket Reviews